<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SocialPicks.com: Recent activities for Prashant Sarkar</title>
    <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/psreinc</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy;2007 SocialPicks</copyright>
    <item>
      <title>The leopard delay isn't such a bad move... (AAPL, rated BUY)</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/22400</link>
      <description>Industry analysts have cried wolf over Apple's recent announcement delaying the Leopard OS' release by a few months. Apple has explained that the iPhone requires more resources (engineering and QA) than previously expected and so they are shifting some manpower from the Leopard team to the iPhone team. &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;  First of all, this is a 4 months delay - hardly anything compared to the years that Vista was delayed. This is not such a big deal. Not even to the hardcore mac guys. Why? Apple will only be delaying the Leopard so that they can thoroughly test it before releasing it. The actual OS will be complete by the WWDC in June as originally planned, but they will not have enough time to QA it before WWDC. And so, Apple is going to release a Beta version of the Leopard to the developers at WWDC for free. This will definitely keep them happy - for a while. &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;  Many claim that this move signifies 'Apple abandoning the mac for some toys'. While this does initially look like the Mac were abandoning its staple Mac OS for the unpredictable and risky iPhone venture. But lets take a step back and look at the options that Apple had at this stage. Just a few months ago, the iPhone announcement received massive media coverage - almost every single publication (tech and non-tech) had something to say about the iPhone - and in most cases, the feedback was positive. The Leopard, which was announced a couple of Macworlds before the iPhone got almost no coverage when compared to the iPhone. While the Leopard 'represents' the Mac, its delay isn't such a big deal actually - especially when you compare it to what might have happened if Apple announced that they were delaying the iPhone. &lt;br /&gt;  Some argue that Apple has no right to give the excuse of insufficient manpower. They say that Apple should have no problem spending a little more money on hiring more engineers. Well, a look at the career section of the Apple website does show that they are hiring feverishly. However, hiring cannot help them solve a short-term problem like this. They had to shift resources. &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;  It is also wrong to assume that the iPhone is completely independent of the 'Mac'. iPhone runs the Mac OS and its potential to turn PC users to the Mac is incredible. According to  &lt;a href='http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/columns/appleent/article.php/3672026'&gt;John Welch &lt;/a&gt;, the iLife, the iPhone and Final Cut Pro are all doing one thing - bringing back attention to the Mac. The iPhone is perhaps going to have a stronger influence on getting in new Mac users than the Leopard itself. &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;  Therefore, concerns about Apple fumbling around are definitely misplaced. Steve and his guys know what they are doing and they seem to be on the right track. If all goes well, lots of people are going to be really happy when the iPhone comes out. And they will be pleasantly surprised to see Leopard when it does get released.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:47:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ML on Goldman Sach's Conviction Buy list (MER, rated BUY)</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/22099</link>
      <description>Goldman Sach's recently added Merrill Lynch to its Conviction Buy list. That's a list of top stocks to buy that Goldman Sach's maintains. &lt;br /&gt;  MER had reached an all time high on Jan 18 this year, proving its impressive growth potential and strong performance. Since then it suffered a minor drop mainly due to investor concern about Merrill Lynch's focus on the subprime mortgage market and the risks associated with it. However, numerous analysts have discounted this concern since and the stocks are recovering steadily. &lt;br /&gt;  Merrill Lynch will announce its quarterly results on Apr 19, 2007 and analysts believe that the results will be impressive. This will cause a further upward climb in stock prices. At this rate, the stocks could be expected to reach the 88$ mark in a month's time.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:42:50 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MER</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vonage in hot water after temporary injunction on adding new customers (VG, rated SELL)</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/20866</link>
      <description>Vonage has been going through tough times lately. It is on the losing end of a patent lawsuit with Verizon communications. Verizon has accused Vonage of infringing several of its VOIP related patents. The company was slammed with an injunction on Friday morning that prevented it from adding new customers. However, Vonage got some mild reprieve on Friday evening when the injunction was temporarily lifted. Vonage will have 2 weeks to convince the court to stay the injunction. The injunction comes right after a 23rd March court decision forcing Vonage to stop using all technology that infringes on Verizon patents. &lt;br /&gt;  Vonage stocks have been falling steadily since its May 2006 IPO, from $17 to $3.37. It suffered a 26% drop in share price after the Mar 23 judgement. The stocks fell a further 7% today. It is expected that the stocks will continue to fall below the $3 mark. In fact, many are speculating that the company may not survive this debacle at all. A Vonage lawyer has been quoted as saying that the injunction court order was the equivalent of &amp;quot;cutting of the Oxygen&amp;quot; to Vonage. Verizon's stocks on the other hand, have been steadily rising throughout this episode. &lt;br /&gt;  Verizon currently has about 2.2 million customers and claims to be losing over 50,000 customers a month. It has cash reserves of about $500m. &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;  Sources:  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;a href='http://origin.mercurynews.com/business/ci_5609388'&gt;http://origin.mercurynews.com/business/ci_5609388&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;a href='http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/06/technology/vonage.reut'&gt;http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/06/technology/vonage.reut&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:22:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">VG</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) is a BUY</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/18705</link>
      <description>	
	
	
	
      &lt;!-- START OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;
      &lt;div class="analysisBox"&gt;
        &lt;span class="smalltext"&gt;
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;BUY&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 
        rating on &lt;b&gt;Akamai Technologies Inc&lt;/b&gt; 
        (&lt;a href="/stock/AKAM"&gt;AKAM&lt;/a&gt;)
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
        
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Price:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; $51.16
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Date:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; 03/27/2007
        &lt;br/&gt;

            
        
                
        &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;br/&gt;
      
      &lt;!-- END OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:58:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AKAM</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nintendo Co Ltd ADR (NTDOY) is a BUY</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/18704</link>
      <description>	
	
	
	
      &lt;!-- START OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;
      &lt;div class="analysisBox"&gt;
        &lt;span class="smalltext"&gt;
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;BUY&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 
        rating on &lt;b&gt;Nintendo Co Ltd ADR&lt;/b&gt; 
        (&lt;a href="/stock/NTDOY"&gt;NTDOY&lt;/a&gt;)
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
        
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Price:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; $36.4
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Date:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; 03/27/2007
        &lt;br/&gt;

            
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Allocation:&lt;/span&gt;
        

                &amp;nbsp;
                &lt;a href="/psreinc/portfolio"&gt;4.1%&lt;/a&gt; of portfolio

    
        
                
        &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;br/&gt;
      
      &lt;!-- END OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:51:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NTDOY</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is a SELL</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/11005</link>
      <description>	
	
	
	
      &lt;!-- START OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;
      &lt;div class="analysisBox"&gt;
        &lt;span class="smalltext"&gt;
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;SELL&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 
        rating on &lt;b&gt;Microsoft Corp&lt;/b&gt; 
        (&lt;a href="/stock/MSFT"&gt;MSFT&lt;/a&gt;)
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
        
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Price:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; $28.89
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Date:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; 02/11/2007
        &lt;br/&gt;

            
        
                
        &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;br/&gt;
      
      &lt;!-- END OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:06:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Computer Inc (AAPL) is a BUY</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/11004</link>
      <description>	
	
	
	
      &lt;!-- START OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;
      &lt;div class="analysisBox"&gt;
        &lt;span class="smalltext"&gt;
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;BUY&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 
        rating on &lt;b&gt;Apple Computer Inc&lt;/b&gt; 
        (&lt;a href="/stock/AAPL"&gt;AAPL&lt;/a&gt;)
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
        
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Price:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; $84.43
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Date:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; 02/11/2007
        &lt;br/&gt;

            
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Allocation:&lt;/span&gt;
        

                &amp;nbsp;
                &lt;a href="/psreinc/portfolio"&gt;21.5%&lt;/a&gt; of portfolio

    
        
                
        &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;br/&gt;
      
      &lt;!-- END OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:06:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Inc (GOOG) is a BUY</title>
      <link>http://www.socialpicks.com/ideas/show/11003</link>
      <description>	
	
	
	
      &lt;!-- START OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;
      &lt;div class="analysisBox"&gt;
        &lt;span class="smalltext"&gt;
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;BUY&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 
        rating on &lt;b&gt;Google Inc&lt;/b&gt; 
        (&lt;a href="/stock/GOOG"&gt;GOOG&lt;/a&gt;)
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
        
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Price:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; $460.67999
        &lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Start Date:&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp; 02/11/2007
        &lt;br/&gt;

            
        
        &lt;br/&gt;&lt;span class="lightblack"&gt;Allocation:&lt;/span&gt;
        

                &amp;nbsp;
                &lt;a href="/psreinc/portfolio"&gt;52.1%&lt;/a&gt; of portfolio

    
        
                
        &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/span&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;br/&gt;
      
      &lt;!-- END OF NO ANALYSIS --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:06:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <author>Prashant Sarkar</author>
      <category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
