The FinancialContent Network     SocialPicks Community   |   MarketMinute Monitor   |   MarketMinute Market Updates   |   MarketMinute Stock News
SocialPicks
   Sign Up   |   Log In   |   What is SocialPicks?     
28 pts

Opinion on  Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LEH)     Sector: Financial  >  Industry: Investment Services
Why there is now bottom in sight

Aug 28, 2008 01:53 AM GMT
Newsmonkey
Return Risk
-19.09% LOW
Sr. Associate

Recent News   Fundamental Analysis   Analyst Recommendation  

When considering if financial stocks have hit bottom first consider this research piece by Bridgewater , the worlds 2nd largest hedge fund.   It doesn't bode well for  LEH, the financial industry, the US Dollar, or the  US economy in general.  This is no time to be taking speculative positions in securities that neither you or I have the ability to analyze completely enough to  make a sophisticated investment decision.  In markets like these you are far better off protecting your capital than trying to catch falling knives.

~~~~~~~~~~~

U.S. study estimated losses of financial institutions at $1.6 trillion dollars

by Marco Zanchi

Those that assume the misery is coming to an end are wrong. When it comes to writedowns, losses and raising fresh capital, the crisis has only just begun for banks. Losses are expected t reach $1.6 trillion, only a fraction of which have been uncovered. This is the conclusion of a confidential study made available to Sonntagszeitung.

But that is not everything. While banks give their word of honor that no further capital is needed, the paper by Bridgewater Associates says: "We have big doubts that financial institutions will be able to obtain enough new capital in order to cover the losses. This will worsen the credit crunch. "

"If everything they say is true," says Charles Wyplosz, a professor at the University of Geneva, " a number of financial institutions will face bankruptcy." The research paper is ‘hot ‘in professional circles not only because of its content, but also because of the originator; Bridgewater Associates is the second-largest hedge fund in the world. The people behind it are brilliant, first among them Ray Dalio, who founded the company more than thirty years ago.

$26.6 trillion of debt is considered risky

The company is one of the big names in the industry. Their macro-analyses especially have weight in central banks - some central banks are customers of Bridgewater. When asked, the Swiss National Bank replied that they do not comment on such studies on principle.

What is at risk for the banks? In order to identify the dimensions of the crisis for financial institutions, Bridgewater has calculated the expected losses on a wide range of risky credit-based U.S. assets such as mortgages, credit- or credit card-receivables. Then, one would need to know basically who had how much on the books. The total value of these risky comes to $26.6 trillion dollars. The losses on these assets would then sum to $1.6 trillion dollars, if all of the assets were valued at market prices and not marked to model, writes Ray Dalio.

Traditional credit loans are not on the balance sheet at market prices, because they are not traded. The loss, when applied to the $26.6 trillion face value of assets, is an impairment of 6 percent. If market prices rise, the size of the loss is reduced; If prices fall, the losses increase.

US credit institutions are holding the largest losses.

Bridgewater has calculated that, so far, financial institutions have only acknowledged losses of $400 billion. Non-US banks - especially UBS - have provided the lion’s share of that at $238 billion. Therefore, the greatest expected future losses should be at U.S. credit institutions. This includes names such as Citigroup, Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase and many smaller institutions unknown here in Switzerland.

Why? That’s because lending is their core business, and they hold the majority of the assets. But, it is also because a large part of the losses are in the form of traditional bank loans, and, unlike securitized mortgages, these are not traded. So, their value has not been corrected on the balance sheet. "If we assess [the validity of] current market prices, we have a long way to go, because these institutions have only acknowledged one-sixth of their expected losses resulting from the credit crisis," writes Bridgewater. Five-sixths comes to nearly $500 billion.

The big question is: Can the banks plug these holes from the losses with new equity capital? Alone for the U.S. banks named above, we are talking about $400 billion, estimates Bridgewater. The banking industry does not have enough healthy institutions to absorb the sick. Meanwhile bank shares are in freefall. And the Middle Eastern Sovereign Wealth Funds have lost the appetite.

The international interdependence makes everything much more complicated

If the banks, as Dalio fears, do not succeed in mobilizing enough fresh capital, they would be forced to sell assets - and in a cyclical downturn at that. That could trigger a classic death spiral downwards, as sales of assets would pressure their share prices, which in turn weakens the banks' balance sheets and further sales would be necessary. "Once again we have a mountain of distressed assets to sell, which is enormous in comparison with any conceivable demand [for those assets]," says Dalio.

Exacerbating the situation is the fact that, in the Spring, "smart" investors bought large quantities of securitized loans, as their prices fell - in the hope of snapping up a bargain. If the prices continue to drop, these investors will come under severe pressure, especially many who are using borrowed funds.

What’s gotten Dalio so pessimistic? The United States is stuck in a large debt-relief process, a "classic deleveraging," as Japan was in the nineties or as many countries during the world economic crisis in the 30s or developing countries during their debt crises. Only this time everything is much more complex, primarily because of the enormous international interdependence of the financial services industry. Making things worse, U.S. consumers are overly indebted and access to cheap money is blocked now.

Moreover, the United States is dependent on foreign capital in order to finance their lifestyle. "The outlook for the dollar is bleak. Very, very bleak, " a former central banker said to Sonntagszeitung.

The real downturn in the U.S. is only beginning

So far, the financial problems resulting from the financial crisis have been large , but the economic ones have been small, because economic problems follow financial ones with a time delay. After liquidity injections by the U.S. central bank induced a short uptick from March to June, the economy and financial system of the USA should now be on the threshold of a real slowdown, he says. The poor credit environment crisis in the real economy resulting from the financial crisis will now have a negative reciprocal effect on the financial sector.

Phase one of the credit crisis was marked by the collapse of the real estate market in the U.S. and the crash in the market for subprime mortgages. Phase two - a kind of calm before the storm - began with the rescue of the U.S. investment bank Bear Stearns in mid-March. This phase came to an end in June, when optimism in the financial markets waned again. Now phase three is set to start. "Bridgewater is on the pessimistic side, no question," says George Magnus, Senior Economic Adviser at UBS in London, "but Bridgewater is absolutely right."


Update 09/04:

Thinking of investing in finacial stocks.  Consider Bil Gross's comments first.

Bond manager Bill Gross wants to spread the bailout wealth. Gross says in a commentary posted on the Pimco Web site Thursday that the government must “open up the balance sheet of the U.S. Treasury” to support Fannie Mae ( FNM ), Freddie Mac ( FRE ) and, in a new twist, “Mom and Pop on Main Street U.S.A.” as well.

Gross has previously said he believes the Treasury will have to assist Fannie and Freddie in any efforts to raise new capital. His Pimco Total Return bond fund has major positions in mortgage-backed bonds issued by the government-sponsored enterprises, so it’s no surprise that he sees it that way. But now he’s calling on Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to use federal funds to buy more housing-related assets, in the name of preventing asset-price deflation from spiraling out of control.

Gross writes that the government should be more aggressively issuing subsidized home loans and creating funds to buy distressed properties, to help inject cash into U.S. households and slow the plunge in home prices. He writes that federal assistance is required because the deleveraging sweeping the financial sector has moved from asset liquidiation to debt liquidation - a process, he writes, that “can turn a campfire into a forest fire, a mild asset bear market into a destructive financial tsunami.”

Gross argues that Paulson and other policymakers must overcome their unwillingness to offer relief to households, after a decade in which Americans went on a record spending spree using borrowed money. He says that regardless of the source of the problem, plunging asset prices will only become more intractable as time marches on.

“The bill for our collective speculative profligacy, obvious in the deflating asset markets, can be paid now or it can be paid later,” Gross wrote. “The tab will be less if paid up front, than if swept under a rug of moral umbrage intent on seeking retribution for any and all of those responsible.”


Update 09/12:

Dick Fuld is widely rumored to be shopping far and wide for buyers of all of Lehman and abandoning earlier efforts to spin/split/sell the crown jewels in order to stay independent.  Sounds great right? So why is the stock hitting new lows?  eh...maybe not so great when you consider what would be left after a sell.  What Dick needed was an aggressive buyer  willing to pay top dollar. The only real problem is that noone is exactly aggressive anymore.  They jumped a long time ago and Dick's timing has been poor.

Now that Dick is willing to sell the entire firm the question remains: Are there any buyers.  Not likely.  Not willing buyers anyway.

Today, B of A is said to be in talks to buy the firm in what looks to me like another shotgun wedding by the Fed and we all know how willing the Fed has been into the past to protect the equity holders.    CNBC reported tonight that interested buyers want help from the Fed and to me that is code for downside protection for some of their sketchier assets.  That doesn't bode well for the stock price (or the preferred stock for that matter) because you can rest assure that no one is in the mood to protect equity at the expense of the tax payer so to the extent a marrage is arranged (at gun point) don't expect anything more than a nominal value for the equity if that. 

The bull case: buying LEH is potentially a long dated option but remember options usually expire on the Saturday following the 3rd Friday in the month...GULP! Long dated?


LEH:  This call was made on 08/28/08 @ $15.1
Rating:   Negative   $15.1 (08/28/08)
Closed:   09/15/2008 @ $0.19 (+98.74% in 18 days)
Target:   $2.00 (-86.75%) in > one year


Comments (1)

Add Comment

Arrow_up
Arrow_down
Newsmonkey
newsmonkey   71%     1 point   commented 465 days ago reply

Title should read "Why there is no bottom in sight"


Your Comment

Who voted on this idea?
jaekab N/A 09/02/2008



ROCK-STAR INVESTORS
Rank Name Sharpe Ratio Avg Return Followers
1 21.10 +34.44% 381
2 18.14 +71.24% 211
3 17.66 +25.60% 55
4 13.47 +14.32% 62
5 12.13 +74.22% 40


POPULAR STOCKS
Symbol Company Name Sentiment

TODAY'S HEADLINES

TODAY'S TOP PICKS

 
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LEH)
   SocialPicks Sentiment:   

   This Quarter's Sentiment:
All:
0.0%
Top:
0.0%




Latest Picks by newsmonkey
Symbol SP Sentiment Rating Return Since
GLD Positive +57.79% 10/27/08
CAT Negative -53.10% 10/22/08
JOYG Negative -98.28% 10/21/08
PBY Negative -111.54% 10/20/08
MS Negative -53.54% 10/20/08

View All >
   
newsmonkey previously rated LEH
Negative +20.98% Lehman Brothers will continue to bleed
07/19/2008
2





IN THE PRESS
Press_forbes Press_washingtonpost Press_wsj Press_npr Press_techcrunch